<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 169 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35305</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the appellants were not manufacturers of the blended yarn, the individual spinners were not hired laborers, and the appellants did not exercise control or supervision over the artisans. The duty demands were dismissed, and the appeals were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73900" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 169 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35305</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the appellants were not manufacturers of the blended yarn, the individual spinners were not hired laborers, and the appellants did not exercise control or supervision over the artisans. The duty demands were dismissed, and the appeals were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35305</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>