https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311592 A co-operative society's election process was challenged on two grounds: acquiescence and statutory validity. Where petitioners signed the minutes certifying satisfaction with the polling and raised no contemporaneous objection, they were held barred from later disputing alleged defects in the voters' list, ballot issuance, voting, or counting. On the statutory issue, the Court stated that the general body cannot bypass the Himachal Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act, 1968 and the Rules by electing only the President and authorising him to nominate other office-bearers and committee members. Such nominations were treated as contrary to the statutory scheme and without legal effect, and fresh elections were directed. en-us Mon, 26 Jul 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 04 Jan 2024 12:49:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311592 A co-operative society's election process was challenged on two grounds: acquiescence and statutory validity. Where petitioners signed the minutes certifying satisfaction with the polling and raised no contemporaneous objection, they were held barred from later disputing alleged defects in the voters' list, ballot issuance, voting, or counting. On the statutory issue, the Court stated that the general body cannot bypass the Himachal Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act, 1968 and the Rules by electing only the President and authorising him to nominate other office-bearers and committee members. Such nominations were treated as contrary to the statutory scheme and without legal effect, and fresh elections were directed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 26 Jul 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311592