<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (3) TMI 184 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35298</link>
    <description>Marketability is a prerequisite for excise duty on an intermediate product, and Revenue must prove that the goods are capable of being marketed and are commercially known as a product. Where the record does not show proper examination of that foundational requirement, the matter cannot be finally decided and must be re-examined by the original authority. The remand was also treated as keeping open the other surviving contentions, so classification and exemption issues were to be considered in the de novo adjudication. The impugned order was set aside and the dispute sent back for fresh decision after evidence and hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73893" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (3) TMI 184 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35298</link>
      <description>Marketability is a prerequisite for excise duty on an intermediate product, and Revenue must prove that the goods are capable of being marketed and are commercially known as a product. Where the record does not show proper examination of that foundational requirement, the matter cannot be finally decided and must be re-examined by the original authority. The remand was also treated as keeping open the other surviving contentions, so classification and exemption issues were to be considered in the de novo adjudication. The impugned order was set aside and the dispute sent back for fresh decision after evidence and hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35298</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>