<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Reconsideration Needed: Are Partners and Partnership Firms Distinct for Service Tax? Cadila Healthcare Case Ignored.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=73943</link>
    <description>Distinct persons or not - partners and partnerships firm - Since the Adjudicating Authorities have not seen judgment of Cadila Healthcare, in the interest of justice, the matter needs to go back for reconsideration in the light of the judgments in the case of Cadila Healthcare. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2024 09:10:13 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2024 20:26:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=738926" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Reconsideration Needed: Are Partners and Partnership Firms Distinct for Service Tax? Cadila Healthcare Case Ignored.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=73943</link>
      <description>Distinct persons or not - partners and partnerships firm - Since the Adjudicating Authorities have not seen judgment of Cadila Healthcare, in the interest of justice, the matter needs to go back for reconsideration in the light of the judgments in the case of Cadila Healthcare. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2024 09:10:13 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=73943</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>