<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (1) TMI 137 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447738</link>
    <description>Leasing of a gas genset was treated as a transfer of the right to use goods where the contract gave the lessee beneficial possession, exclusive use and effective control during the lease period. On that basis, the transaction was characterised as a deemed sale under Article 366(29A)(d) and VAT treatment applied. The service tax entry for supply of tangible goods for use was held inapplicable because it covers only arrangements in which possession and effective control remain with the supplier. The stated principle is that a transaction already falling within the VAT characterisation cannot be reclassified for service tax on the same facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2024 15:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=738920" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (1) TMI 137 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447738</link>
      <description>Leasing of a gas genset was treated as a transfer of the right to use goods where the contract gave the lessee beneficial possession, exclusive use and effective control during the lease period. On that basis, the transaction was characterised as a deemed sale under Article 366(29A)(d) and VAT treatment applied. The service tax entry for supply of tangible goods for use was held inapplicable because it covers only arrangements in which possession and effective control remain with the supplier. The stated principle is that a transaction already falling within the VAT characterisation cannot be reclassified for service tax on the same facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447738</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>