<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (1) TMI 107 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447708</link>
    <description>ITAT Bangalore ruled that interest paid on late payment of TDS is not an allowable deduction under section 37(1) as it cannot be regarded as an expense incurred wholly or exclusively for business purposes. The Tribunal held that interest under section 201(1A) is equivalent to interest under section 234 on delayed income tax payment, thus not deductible. Regarding TDS credit, the matter was remanded to AO for fresh consideration after proper reconciliation. The Tribunal upheld addition of income admitted during survey proceedings where capital expenditure was wrongly treated as revenue expenditure, rejecting the assessee&#039;s challenge to their own acknowledged mistake.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2024 18:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=738844" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (1) TMI 107 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447708</link>
      <description>ITAT Bangalore ruled that interest paid on late payment of TDS is not an allowable deduction under section 37(1) as it cannot be regarded as an expense incurred wholly or exclusively for business purposes. The Tribunal held that interest under section 201(1A) is equivalent to interest under section 234 on delayed income tax payment, thus not deductible. Regarding TDS credit, the matter was remanded to AO for fresh consideration after proper reconciliation. The Tribunal upheld addition of income admitted during survey proceedings where capital expenditure was wrongly treated as revenue expenditure, rejecting the assessee&#039;s challenge to their own acknowledged mistake.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447708</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>