https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447706 ITAT Mumbai partly allowed the assessee's appeal regarding undisclosed income differences identified during survey. The tribunal found that professional fees deductions were already accounted for during survey and should have been granted. Out of duplicate bills totaling Rs. 11,07,238/-, only Rs. 4,22,595/- was properly disallowed while Rs. 6,84,643/- should have been allowed as repetitive bills. The assessee was granted total relief of Rs. 14,47,343/- comprising professional fees of Rs. 7,62,730/- and repetitive bills of Rs. 6,84,643/-. The AO was directed to retain addition of only Rs. 4,79,261/- from the original addition of Rs. 19,26,634/-. en-us Fri, 27 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 02 Jan 2024 18:28:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447706 ITAT Mumbai partly allowed the assessee's appeal regarding undisclosed income differences identified during survey. The tribunal found that professional fees deductions were already accounted for during survey and should have been granted. Out of duplicate bills totaling Rs. 11,07,238/-, only Rs. 4,22,595/- was properly disallowed while Rs. 6,84,643/- should have been allowed as repetitive bills. The assessee was granted total relief of Rs. 14,47,343/- comprising professional fees of Rs. 7,62,730/- and repetitive bills of Rs. 6,84,643/-. The AO was directed to retain addition of only Rs. 4,79,261/- from the original addition of Rs. 19,26,634/-. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 27 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447706