<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (1) TMI 102 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447703</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed the writ petition challenging the denial of a cross-examination request. The court held that since the respondent did not intend to rely on the officers&#039; statements, which were favorable to the petitioner, cross-examination was unnecessary. Citing SC precedent, the court emphasized that cross-examination is required only when statements are adverse. The respondent&#039;s decision was deemed lawful, and the petition was dismissed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2024 12:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=738837" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (1) TMI 102 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447703</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed the writ petition challenging the denial of a cross-examination request. The court held that since the respondent did not intend to rely on the officers&#039; statements, which were favorable to the petitioner, cross-examination was unnecessary. Citing SC precedent, the court emphasized that cross-examination is required only when statements are adverse. The respondent&#039;s decision was deemed lawful, and the petition was dismissed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447703</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>