https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447702 The Madras HC directed the second respondent to denotify the petitioner's Inland Container Depots within two weeks. The petitioner sought denotification to lease their property for other purposes but faced resistance over Cost Recovery Charges for additional Customs officials. The court held that the Department's claim for charges during periods when Customs officials were not deployed was unjustified, as confirmed by the Legal Advisor's opinion. The HC ruled that respondents cannot deny denotification requests based on unwarranted cost recovery claims for unutilized services. en-us Mon, 04 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 03 Jan 2024 08:14:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447702 The Madras HC directed the second respondent to denotify the petitioner's Inland Container Depots within two weeks. The petitioner sought denotification to lease their property for other purposes but faced resistance over Cost Recovery Charges for additional Customs officials. The court held that the Department's claim for charges during periods when Customs officials were not deployed was unjustified, as confirmed by the Legal Advisor's opinion. The HC ruled that respondents cannot deny denotification requests based on unwarranted cost recovery claims for unutilized services. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 04 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447702