<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (1) TMI 100 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447701</link>
    <description>The Madras HC held that recovery proceedings for drawback relating to alleged non-realization of export proceeds cannot be sustained after 12 years. The court found that attempting to recover drawback for shipping bills from 2004-09 after nearly 12 years was unreasonable and failed the test of reasonableness. The recovery order was set aside and the writ petition was disposed of, establishing that such delayed recovery proceedings are impermissible due to the excessive time lapse.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2024 18:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=738833" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (1) TMI 100 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447701</link>
      <description>The Madras HC held that recovery proceedings for drawback relating to alleged non-realization of export proceeds cannot be sustained after 12 years. The court found that attempting to recover drawback for shipping bills from 2004-09 after nearly 12 years was unreasonable and failed the test of reasonableness. The recovery order was set aside and the writ petition was disposed of, establishing that such delayed recovery proceedings are impermissible due to the excessive time lapse.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447701</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>