https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447689 Section 309 CrPC was treated as governing remand during adjournments without requiring recorded reasons for every remand-extension order after filing of the complaint. The Court also rejected house arrest, finding no extraordinary circumstances, while noting that access to relied upon documents should be ensured and custody concerns may be raised in a regular bail application subject to the special statute. On Section 167(2) CrPC, the complaint was not considered incomplete merely because further investigation was stated to be continuing; since the filed complaint and materials were sufficient for trial to proceed, statutory bail was denied. en-us Fri, 15 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 02 Jan 2024 18:16:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447689 Section 309 CrPC was treated as governing remand during adjournments without requiring recorded reasons for every remand-extension order after filing of the complaint. The Court also rejected house arrest, finding no extraordinary circumstances, while noting that access to relied upon documents should be ensured and custody concerns may be raised in a regular bail application subject to the special statute. On Section 167(2) CrPC, the complaint was not considered incomplete merely because further investigation was stated to be continuing; since the filed complaint and materials were sufficient for trial to proceed, statutory bail was denied. Case-Laws Money Laundering Fri, 15 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447689