<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (11) TMI 58 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35284</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the reassessment proceedings initiated under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, finding that the Assessing Officer had the authority to do so if there was a reason to believe income had escaped assessment. The appellant&#039;s claim for deduction on account of Duty Draw Back and DEPB incentives under Section 80-IB was disallowed as they did not qualify as &quot;profits derived from industrial undertaking.&quot; The court dismissed the appeal, ruling no substantial question of law arose from the ITAT&#039;s order, and confirming the correctness of the reassessment decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2012 15:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73879" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (11) TMI 58 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35284</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the reassessment proceedings initiated under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, finding that the Assessing Officer had the authority to do so if there was a reason to believe income had escaped assessment. The appellant&#039;s claim for deduction on account of Duty Draw Back and DEPB incentives under Section 80-IB was disallowed as they did not qualify as &quot;profits derived from industrial undertaking.&quot; The court dismissed the appeal, ruling no substantial question of law arose from the ITAT&#039;s order, and confirming the correctness of the reassessment decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35284</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>