https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311561 Permission to adduce secondary evidence under Section 65 of the Indian Evidence Act was refused because the application lacked an affidavit and contained vague averments, and no error was found in that refusal. The court, however, preserved the interests of justice by granting liberty to file a fresh application with a proper affidavit and full particulars showing why Section 65 is attracted. If such an application is filed within four weeks, the trial court must decide it afresh on its own merits, uninfluenced by the earlier rejection. en-us Mon, 10 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 02 Jan 2024 17:45:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311561 Permission to adduce secondary evidence under Section 65 of the Indian Evidence Act was refused because the application lacked an affidavit and contained vague averments, and no error was found in that refusal. The court, however, preserved the interests of justice by granting liberty to file a fresh application with a proper affidavit and full particulars showing why Section 65 is attracted. If such an application is filed within four weeks, the trial court must decide it afresh on its own merits, uninfluenced by the earlier rejection. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 10 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311561