<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (1) TMI 59 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447660</link>
    <description>ITAT Delhi held that additions made by AO under section 153A were unsustainable in absence of incriminating material during search/survey. Following Kabul Chawla case affirmed by SC in Abhisar Buildwell, CIT(A) correctly deleted additions as Revenue failed to produce seized material justifying the additions. The tribunal found no infirmity in CIT(A)&#039;s order since no incriminating materials were seized relating to the disputed additions. Decision favored assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2024 09:12:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=738740" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (1) TMI 59 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447660</link>
      <description>ITAT Delhi held that additions made by AO under section 153A were unsustainable in absence of incriminating material during search/survey. Following Kabul Chawla case affirmed by SC in Abhisar Buildwell, CIT(A) correctly deleted additions as Revenue failed to produce seized material justifying the additions. The tribunal found no infirmity in CIT(A)&#039;s order since no incriminating materials were seized relating to the disputed additions. Decision favored assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447660</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>