<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (1) TMI 55 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447656</link>
    <description>The Tribunal determined that the penalty order dated 29/03/2022 was barred by limitation, as it was issued beyond the statutory time frame outlined in section 275(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Consequently, the orders under section 271D were quashed, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2024 09:11:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=738734" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (1) TMI 55 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447656</link>
      <description>The Tribunal determined that the penalty order dated 29/03/2022 was barred by limitation, as it was issued beyond the statutory time frame outlined in section 275(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Consequently, the orders under section 271D were quashed, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447656</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>