<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (9) TMI 358 - CESTAT,  MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35277</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that loading goods onto trucks for transportation to Calcutta did not constitute an attempt to export over-valued goods. Consequently, the goods were not liable to confiscation under the Customs Act, 1962. As there was no evidence of an intention to export from Calcutta and the penalties were unjustified, the Tribunal set aside the confiscation and penalties imposed on the appellants. The appeals were allowed in favor of the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73873" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (9) TMI 358 - CESTAT,  MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35277</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that loading goods onto trucks for transportation to Calcutta did not constitute an attempt to export over-valued goods. Consequently, the goods were not liable to confiscation under the Customs Act, 1962. As there was no evidence of an intention to export from Calcutta and the penalties were unjustified, the Tribunal set aside the confiscation and penalties imposed on the appellants. The appeals were allowed in favor of the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35277</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>