<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (1) TMI 48 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447649</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed under Section 421 of the Companies Act, 2013, due to procedural lapses and unsatisfactory conduct by the Appellant. Despite granting condonation for a 39-day delay in re-filing, the Tribunal criticized the Appellant for failing to file a certified copy of the order and for inconsistent counsel authorization. The Tribunal refrained from addressing the merits of the case, emphasizing the importance of adhering to procedural requirements. The appeal was ultimately dismissed due to these procedural deficiencies and the Appellant&#039;s conduct.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2024 20:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=738720" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (1) TMI 48 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447649</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed under Section 421 of the Companies Act, 2013, due to procedural lapses and unsatisfactory conduct by the Appellant. Despite granting condonation for a 39-day delay in re-filing, the Tribunal criticized the Appellant for failing to file a certified copy of the order and for inconsistent counsel authorization. The Tribunal refrained from addressing the merits of the case, emphasizing the importance of adhering to procedural requirements. The appeal was ultimately dismissed due to these procedural deficiencies and the Appellant&#039;s conduct.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447649</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>