<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 1644 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311553</link>
    <description>The Rajasthan HC held that excise officers conducted an illegal search and seizure at petitioner&#039;s premises on October 19, 2005 without proper authorization under Section 82 of the Central Excise Act. The court found that documents were seized without a search warrant, contrary to statutory requirements. Despite officers threatening the firm&#039;s partner with arrest when he objected to the proceedings, no denial was recorded by respondents. The HC ruled the entire proceedings were vitiated due to non-compliance with Section 82 provisions and quashed the October 19, 2005 proceedings, allowing the petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2024 21:21:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=738695" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 1644 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311553</link>
      <description>The Rajasthan HC held that excise officers conducted an illegal search and seizure at petitioner&#039;s premises on October 19, 2005 without proper authorization under Section 82 of the Central Excise Act. The court found that documents were seized without a search warrant, contrary to statutory requirements. Despite officers threatening the firm&#039;s partner with arrest when he objected to the proceedings, no denial was recorded by respondents. The HC ruled the entire proceedings were vitiated due to non-compliance with Section 82 provisions and quashed the October 19, 2005 proceedings, allowing the petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311553</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>