<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (1) TMI 25 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447626</link>
    <description>The ITAT Hyderabad allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal against penalty under section 271D for cash receipt contravening section 269SS. The tribunal held that penalty under section 271D requires satisfaction to be recorded in the assessment order, following the SC precedent in Jai Laxmi Rice Mills case. The tribunal relied on decisions from ITAT Indore and Telangana HC, establishing that without proper assessment proceedings and recorded satisfaction in the assessment order, penalty under section 271D is invalid and must be quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Dec 2023 13:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=738645" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (1) TMI 25 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447626</link>
      <description>The ITAT Hyderabad allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal against penalty under section 271D for cash receipt contravening section 269SS. The tribunal held that penalty under section 271D requires satisfaction to be recorded in the assessment order, following the SC precedent in Jai Laxmi Rice Mills case. The tribunal relied on decisions from ITAT Indore and Telangana HC, establishing that without proper assessment proceedings and recorded satisfaction in the assessment order, penalty under section 271D is invalid and must be quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447626</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>