<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (5) TMI 84 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35267</link>
    <description>HC directed release of imported goods within 48 hours to the petitioner, holding that Customs cannot withhold goods solely because imports were made in the petitioner&#039;s name while IEC irregularities exist, where the petitioner holds a valid IEC and has paid customs duty. The court observed no provision in the Customs Act or rules empowering Customs to refuse release on that basis; any misrepresentation in obtaining the IEC is for the Ministry/DGFT to address. At most, administrative action against IEC issuance may follow, but duty-paid goods must be delivered.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2025 14:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73863" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (5) TMI 84 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35267</link>
      <description>HC directed release of imported goods within 48 hours to the petitioner, holding that Customs cannot withhold goods solely because imports were made in the petitioner&#039;s name while IEC irregularities exist, where the petitioner holds a valid IEC and has paid customs duty. The court observed no provision in the Customs Act or rules empowering Customs to refuse release on that basis; any misrepresentation in obtaining the IEC is for the Ministry/DGFT to address. At most, administrative action against IEC issuance may follow, but duty-paid goods must be delivered.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35267</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>