https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447608 Validity of Rule 5A(2) of the Service Tax Rules, 1994, as revived after insertion of Section 94(2)(k) of the Finance Act, 1994, remained in issue, along with whether the earlier views in Travelite and Mega Cabs required reconsideration in light of Aargus and Vianaar. The matters were referred to the Hon'ble Chief Justice for constitution of an appropriate larger Bench to determine the issue authoritatively, and the interim orders were directed to continue until the next date of hearing. en-us Wed, 11 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 Mar 2024 13:04:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447608 Validity of Rule 5A(2) of the Service Tax Rules, 1994, as revived after insertion of Section 94(2)(k) of the Finance Act, 1994, remained in issue, along with whether the earlier views in Travelite and Mega Cabs required reconsideration in light of Aargus and Vianaar. The matters were referred to the Hon'ble Chief Justice for constitution of an appropriate larger Bench to determine the issue authoritatively, and the interim orders were directed to continue until the next date of hearing. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 11 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447608