<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Finds Insufficient Financial Proof to Support Cheque Dishonor Claim; Rebuts Presumption Under Negotiable Instruments Act.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=73867</link>
    <description>Dishonour of Cheque - rebuttal of presumption - the learned Trial Court had rightly doubted the financial capacity of the complainant and had rightly held that the presumption contained in Section 139 of the Negotiable Instrument Act was rebutted. This was a reasonable view taken by the learned Trial Court - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2024 07:15:01 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2024 07:15:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=738613" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Finds Insufficient Financial Proof to Support Cheque Dishonor Claim; Rebuts Presumption Under Negotiable Instruments Act.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=73867</link>
      <description>Dishonour of Cheque - rebuttal of presumption - the learned Trial Court had rightly doubted the financial capacity of the complainant and had rightly held that the presumption contained in Section 139 of the Negotiable Instrument Act was rebutted. This was a reasonable view taken by the learned Trial Court - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2024 07:15:01 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=73867</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>