<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 1897 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311516</link>
    <description>ITAT Bangalore allowed assessee&#039;s appeal on multiple grounds. The tribunal upheld 60% depreciation on telecom/computer equipment, ruling such equipment falls under computer systems definition. Section 10A deduction was permitted as assessee satisfied export of computer software and foreign exchange repatriation requirements. Section 80JJAA deduction was allowed since assessee&#039;s IT-enabled services qualified as industrial undertaking with eligible workmen payments. However, Section 35D deduction matter regarding stamp duty expenditure was remanded to AO for verification of whether expenditure increased share capital, determining its treatment as capital or revenue expenditure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Dec 2023 08:30:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=738527" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 1897 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311516</link>
      <description>ITAT Bangalore allowed assessee&#039;s appeal on multiple grounds. The tribunal upheld 60% depreciation on telecom/computer equipment, ruling such equipment falls under computer systems definition. Section 10A deduction was permitted as assessee satisfied export of computer software and foreign exchange repatriation requirements. Section 80JJAA deduction was allowed since assessee&#039;s IT-enabled services qualified as industrial undertaking with eligible workmen payments. However, Section 35D deduction matter regarding stamp duty expenditure was remanded to AO for verification of whether expenditure increased share capital, determining its treatment as capital or revenue expenditure.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311516</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>