<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 1495 - CUSTOMS AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311515</link>
    <description>The Customs Authority for Advance Rulings, Mumbai ruled that a private undertaking establishing solar power plants in Maharashtra is eligible for concessional customs duty rates under notification 230/1986-Cus. The AAR held that solar power projects fall within the definition of &quot;power plant&quot; under the Project Import Regulations, as the law does not restrict benefits to specific types of power generation. The authority determined that electrical power from various sources including solar qualifies for the exemption, and restricting benefits to particular power plant types would be perverse interpretation of the clear notification language.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Dec 2023 08:30:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=738526" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 1495 - CUSTOMS AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311515</link>
      <description>The Customs Authority for Advance Rulings, Mumbai ruled that a private undertaking establishing solar power plants in Maharashtra is eligible for concessional customs duty rates under notification 230/1986-Cus. The AAR held that solar power projects fall within the definition of &quot;power plant&quot; under the Project Import Regulations, as the law does not restrict benefits to specific types of power generation. The authority determined that electrical power from various sources including solar qualifies for the exemption, and restricting benefits to particular power plant types would be perverse interpretation of the clear notification language.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311515</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>