https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311509 Interim protection was continued where the accused had not been arrested for nearly eleven years after the ECIR and was named only in a later supplementary complaint, not in the original prosecution complaint. The Court treated the prolonged lapse of time and the delayed implication as sufficient grounds to interfere and preserve the protection already granted. The appeal was allowed and the interim protection was made absolute. en-us Mon, 08 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 30 Dec 2023 08:30:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311509 Interim protection was continued where the accused had not been arrested for nearly eleven years after the ECIR and was named only in a later supplementary complaint, not in the original prosecution complaint. The Court treated the prolonged lapse of time and the delayed implication as sufficient grounds to interfere and preserve the protection already granted. The appeal was allowed and the interim protection was made absolute. Case-Laws Money Laundering Mon, 08 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311509