https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311504 Cryptic, non-speaking endorsements rejecting rectification applications under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act were held unsustainable because the applicants were not given an opportunity of personal hearing. The court found that fair consideration of rectification requests requires an intelligible order and observance of hearing before disposal. The endorsements were therefore set aside, and the rectification applications were remitted for fresh consideration after affording personal hearing. en-us Wed, 27 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 30 Dec 2023 08:30:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311504 Cryptic, non-speaking endorsements rejecting rectification applications under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act were held unsustainable because the applicants were not given an opportunity of personal hearing. The court found that fair consideration of rectification requests requires an intelligible order and observance of hearing before disposal. The endorsements were therefore set aside, and the rectification applications were remitted for fresh consideration after affording personal hearing. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 27 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311504