https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447565 The SC held that limitation for filing an appeal before NCLAT begins from the date of pronouncement, not from the date of hearing conclusion. The Court found that no substantive order was passed on the hearing date, and the case was listed for admission, not pronouncement. Since the order was uploaded on the website on a later date, limitation commenced from that date. The appeal, though filed beyond thirty days, was within the condonable fifteen-day period. The matter was remanded to NCLAT for reconsidering condonation of delay. en-us Mon, 04 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 26 May 2026 15:42:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447565 The SC held that limitation for filing an appeal before NCLAT begins from the date of pronouncement, not from the date of hearing conclusion. The Court found that no substantive order was passed on the hearing date, and the case was listed for admission, not pronouncement. Since the order was uploaded on the website on a later date, limitation commenced from that date. The appeal, though filed beyond thirty days, was within the condonable fifteen-day period. The matter was remanded to NCLAT for reconsidering condonation of delay. Case-Laws IBC Mon, 04 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447565