https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447564 The Supreme Court found no ground to interfere with the impugned order allowing the respondent's application under Section 60(5) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, after considering Forms 3 and 5, and dismissed the appeal. It expressly declined to express any view on whether the Section 9 petition was within time, making clear that the dismissal should not be read as a determination of that issue. The appellant was also permitted to move an application for leave to file an additional written statement in light of the amendment allowed by the NCLAT, and any such request is to be decided according to law. en-us Wed, 13 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 30 Dec 2023 08:29:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447564 The Supreme Court found no ground to interfere with the impugned order allowing the respondent's application under Section 60(5) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, after considering Forms 3 and 5, and dismissed the appeal. It expressly declined to express any view on whether the Section 9 petition was within time, making clear that the dismissal should not be read as a determination of that issue. The appellant was also permitted to move an application for leave to file an additional written statement in light of the amendment allowed by the NCLAT, and any such request is to be decided according to law. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Wed, 13 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447564