<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (12) TMI 1245 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447561</link>
    <description>NCLAT dismissed appellant&#039;s application for condonation of 15-day delay in filing appeal. The tribunal found appellant&#039;s reasons insufficient, noting the explanation about procuring documents and delayed counsel instructions appeared halfhearted. Citing SC precedent in National Spot Exchange Limited v. Anil Kohli, NCLAT held delays beyond 15 days cannot be condoned, emphasizing Article 142&#039;s stringent provisions requiring appellants to file within prescribed periods. The application for condonation of 162-day delay in refiling was also dismissed as infructuous.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2023 11:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=738503" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (12) TMI 1245 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447561</link>
      <description>NCLAT dismissed appellant&#039;s application for condonation of 15-day delay in filing appeal. The tribunal found appellant&#039;s reasons insufficient, noting the explanation about procuring documents and delayed counsel instructions appeared halfhearted. Citing SC precedent in National Spot Exchange Limited v. Anil Kohli, NCLAT held delays beyond 15 days cannot be condoned, emphasizing Article 142&#039;s stringent provisions requiring appellants to file within prescribed periods. The application for condonation of 162-day delay in refiling was also dismissed as infructuous.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447561</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>