<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (12) TMI 1241 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447557</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that the amount received as penalty or liquidated damages does not qualify as consideration towards a declared service under Section 66E (e) of the Finance Act, 1994. Consequently, the tax demand by the Department was deemed unsustainable, and the order under challenge was set aside, allowing both appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2023 12:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=738498" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (12) TMI 1241 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447557</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that the amount received as penalty or liquidated damages does not qualify as consideration towards a declared service under Section 66E (e) of the Finance Act, 1994. Consequently, the tax demand by the Department was deemed unsustainable, and the order under challenge was set aside, allowing both appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447557</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>