<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (12) TMI 1239 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447555</link>
    <description>CESTAT Kolkata held that sales tax concession retained by assessee must be included in assessable value for Central Excise duty levy, following SC precedent in Super Synotex case. However, extended period of limitation was not invocable as adjudicating authority failed to establish suppression, with VAT details disclosed in audited financial statements. Penalty under Section 11AC was set aside due to lack of proper findings. Matter remanded for duty calculation for normal limitation period with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Dec 2023 08:28:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=738496" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (12) TMI 1239 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447555</link>
      <description>CESTAT Kolkata held that sales tax concession retained by assessee must be included in assessable value for Central Excise duty levy, following SC precedent in Super Synotex case. However, extended period of limitation was not invocable as adjudicating authority failed to establish suppression, with VAT details disclosed in audited financial statements. Penalty under Section 11AC was set aside due to lack of proper findings. Matter remanded for duty calculation for normal limitation period with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447555</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>