https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447551 Admission of signature on a cheque triggers the statutory presumption of legally enforceable liability, and that presumption is not displaced merely because another person filled in the cheque particulars or because the cheque was described as security. Without defence evidence or other cogent material showing rebuttal on a preponderance of probabilities, the presumption under the Negotiable Instruments Act remains intact. In revision, interference is unwarranted where the concurrent findings below are supported by the record and no perversity or illegality is shown. The conviction for cheque dishonour was therefore sustained. en-us Thu, 07 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 30 Dec 2023 08:28:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447551 Admission of signature on a cheque triggers the statutory presumption of legally enforceable liability, and that presumption is not displaced merely because another person filled in the cheque particulars or because the cheque was described as security. Without defence evidence or other cogent material showing rebuttal on a preponderance of probabilities, the presumption under the Negotiable Instruments Act remains intact. In revision, interference is unwarranted where the concurrent findings below are supported by the record and no perversity or illegality is shown. The conviction for cheque dishonour was therefore sustained. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 07 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447551