<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 20 - HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35230</link>
    <description>The court set aside the transfer order under Section 127(2) of the Income Tax Act as it did not consider the petitioner&#039;s reply or provide reasons for the transfer. The writ petition was allowed, and the order dated 20.11.2009 was annulled. The case was remanded to the Commissioner of Income Tax for issuing a fresh reasoned order after considering the petitioner&#039;s reply. Judgment was delivered on 13.1.2010.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 May 2011 13:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73830" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 20 - HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35230</link>
      <description>The court set aside the transfer order under Section 127(2) of the Income Tax Act as it did not consider the petitioner&#039;s reply or provide reasons for the transfer. The writ petition was allowed, and the order dated 20.11.2009 was annulled. The case was remanded to the Commissioner of Income Tax for issuing a fresh reasoned order after considering the petitioner&#039;s reply. Judgment was delivered on 13.1.2010.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35230</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>