<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 135 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35222</link>
    <description>The appeals by multiple appellants engaged in constructing residential complexes, disputing service tax liability, were allowed by the Tribunal. The Tribunal concluded that the services provided to members of societies did not attract service tax as per legal provisions and circulars. The matter was remanded for further examination on unjust enrichment and claim verification. The judgment was pronounced on 3-7-2009.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2014 15:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73823" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 135 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35222</link>
      <description>The appeals by multiple appellants engaged in constructing residential complexes, disputing service tax liability, were allowed by the Tribunal. The Tribunal concluded that the services provided to members of societies did not attract service tax as per legal provisions and circulars. The matter was remanded for further examination on unjust enrichment and claim verification. The judgment was pronounced on 3-7-2009.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35222</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>