<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 134 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35221</link>
    <description>The tribunal set aside the penalty imposed under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994 on the appellants for delayed service tax payment. The tribunal found that despite the delay, the appellants paid the full tax and interest promptly, rectified discrepancies, and the penalty was not warranted. The interpretation of Sections 73(3) and 73(4) emphasized self-assessment provisions and exceptions for intentional tax evasion. As the appellants acted in good faith, the penalty was deemed unjustified, leading to the appeal being allowed in favor of the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2016 12:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73822" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 134 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35221</link>
      <description>The tribunal set aside the penalty imposed under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994 on the appellants for delayed service tax payment. The tribunal found that despite the delay, the appellants paid the full tax and interest promptly, rectified discrepancies, and the penalty was not warranted. The interpretation of Sections 73(3) and 73(4) emphasized self-assessment provisions and exceptions for intentional tax evasion. As the appellants acted in good faith, the penalty was deemed unjustified, leading to the appeal being allowed in favor of the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35221</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>