<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (5) TMI 83 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35219</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the appellants&#039; activities as a Consignment Agent did not amount to Clearing and Forwarding services, as they did not directly undertake clearing activities from the manufacturer&#039;s premises. Relying on a previous Tribunal decision upheld by the High Court, it was determined that the appellants were not liable to pay service tax under the category of Clearing and Forwarding Agent. The Tribunal set aside the order rejecting the refund claim, allowing the appeal with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 12:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73820" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (5) TMI 83 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35219</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the appellants&#039; activities as a Consignment Agent did not amount to Clearing and Forwarding services, as they did not directly undertake clearing activities from the manufacturer&#039;s premises. Relying on a previous Tribunal decision upheld by the High Court, it was determined that the appellants were not liable to pay service tax under the category of Clearing and Forwarding Agent. The Tribunal set aside the order rejecting the refund claim, allowing the appeal with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35219</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>