<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 132 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35215</link>
    <description>Ticket booking for a principal, without conducting any tours for passengers, did not satisfy the ingredients of taxable &quot;tour operator&quot; service for the relevant period. The record showed only booking activity, and the proceedings did not establish actual tour operation or other facts necessary to bring the consideration within the service tax net. In the absence of proof that the respondent functioned as a tour operator, the demand could not be sustained under that head, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 17:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73817" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 132 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35215</link>
      <description>Ticket booking for a principal, without conducting any tours for passengers, did not satisfy the ingredients of taxable &quot;tour operator&quot; service for the relevant period. The record showed only booking activity, and the proceedings did not establish actual tour operation or other facts necessary to bring the consideration within the service tax net. In the absence of proof that the respondent functioned as a tour operator, the demand could not be sustained under that head, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35215</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>