<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (12) TMI 27 - HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35206</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, affirming that Nirgam Mulya cannot be considered part of the purchase price for calculating profit under Section 44AC of the Income Tax Act. The judgment provides clarity on the interpretation of relevant sections of the Act and emphasizes the importance of accurate assessment procedures in tax matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73808" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (12) TMI 27 - HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35206</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, affirming that Nirgam Mulya cannot be considered part of the purchase price for calculating profit under Section 44AC of the Income Tax Act. The judgment provides clarity on the interpretation of relevant sections of the Act and emphasizes the importance of accurate assessment procedures in tax matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35206</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>