<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (12) TMI 26 - HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35205</link>
    <description>The appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, related to the assessment year 1989-1990, was dismissed by the High Court of Allahabad. The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the assessee, ruling that non-disclosure of work in progress in closing stock was acceptable. The Tribunal&#039;s deletion of certain additions to the assessee&#039;s income was justified based on consistent accounting practices and previous acceptance by the department. Additionally, the Tribunal&#039;s deletion of interest paid by the assessee to various parties was upheld, with no legal flaws found in its previous decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 17:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73807" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (12) TMI 26 - HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35205</link>
      <description>The appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, related to the assessment year 1989-1990, was dismissed by the High Court of Allahabad. The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the assessee, ruling that non-disclosure of work in progress in closing stock was acceptable. The Tribunal&#039;s deletion of certain additions to the assessee&#039;s income was justified based on consistent accounting practices and previous acceptance by the department. Additionally, the Tribunal&#039;s deletion of interest paid by the assessee to various parties was upheld, with no legal flaws found in its previous decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35205</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>