<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (12) TMI 23 - HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35202</link>
    <description>The appeal against the penalty imposed under Section 271-B of the Income Tax Act for late filing of audit reports was dismissed. The court upheld the penalty, emphasizing the importance of complying with statutory deadlines and regulations. The appellant&#039;s argument regarding the initiation of penalty during assessment proceedings and reliance on case law were not accepted. Additionally, the court affirmed the penalty imposed for obtaining the Tax Audit Report after the due date, emphasizing adherence to procedural requirements under Section 44-AB. The appeal by the appellant-assessee was ultimately dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 02 May 2010 22:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73804" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (12) TMI 23 - HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35202</link>
      <description>The appeal against the penalty imposed under Section 271-B of the Income Tax Act for late filing of audit reports was dismissed. The court upheld the penalty, emphasizing the importance of complying with statutory deadlines and regulations. The appellant&#039;s argument regarding the initiation of penalty during assessment proceedings and reliance on case law were not accepted. Additionally, the court affirmed the penalty imposed for obtaining the Tax Audit Report after the due date, emphasizing adherence to procedural requirements under Section 44-AB. The appeal by the appellant-assessee was ultimately dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35202</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>