https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447519 Delay of 706 days in filing the leave petition was condoned because the petitioner showed sufficient cause, explaining that non-filing stemmed from previous counsel's failure to communicate the dismissal and not from deliberate inaction. The complaint, arising from dishonoured cheques, was restored after the court held that a litigant should not suffer irreparable prejudice solely due to counsel's negligence where the matter was intended to be pursued on merits. The dismissal for default and non-prosecution was set aside, and the complaint was remitted for further proceedings on payment of costs. en-us Tue, 19 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 28 Dec 2023 21:21:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447519 Delay of 706 days in filing the leave petition was condoned because the petitioner showed sufficient cause, explaining that non-filing stemmed from previous counsel's failure to communicate the dismissal and not from deliberate inaction. The complaint, arising from dishonoured cheques, was restored after the court held that a litigant should not suffer irreparable prejudice solely due to counsel's negligence where the matter was intended to be pursued on merits. The dismissal for default and non-prosecution was set aside, and the complaint was remitted for further proceedings on payment of costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 19 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447519