<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Purchasers Must Prove Transaction Authenticity for Detained Goods in Transit, Court Rules in Dismissed Revenue Appeal.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=73826</link>
    <description>Detention of goods and vehicles while in transit with valid invoices - Onus on the purchase to prove the genuineness of transaction - High Court has held that, In essence, the petitioners (purchaser) have to establish their own credentials but not the 4th respondent (supplier of goods). - SLP filed by the revenue dismissed - SC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2023 18:06:57 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2023 18:06:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=737931" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Purchasers Must Prove Transaction Authenticity for Detained Goods in Transit, Court Rules in Dismissed Revenue Appeal.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=73826</link>
      <description>Detention of goods and vehicles while in transit with valid invoices - Onus on the purchase to prove the genuineness of transaction - High Court has held that, In essence, the petitioners (purchaser) have to establish their own credentials but not the 4th respondent (supplier of goods). - SLP filed by the revenue dismissed - SC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2023 18:06:57 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=73826</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>