https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311482 The HC of Bombay ruled in favor of the petitioner, allowing the Criminal Application and making the Rule absolute. The court concluded that for a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act to be valid, the cheque must be drawn for the discharge of the drawer's liability. In this case, the cheque was not drawn for the petitioner's liability, and without proper documentation or evidence of liability transfer, no offense was established under Section 138. The judgment emphasized the necessity of clear evidence and documentation for liability transfer in cheque dishonor cases. en-us Thu, 14 Jun 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 08 Jan 2024 16:03:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311482 The HC of Bombay ruled in favor of the petitioner, allowing the Criminal Application and making the Rule absolute. The court concluded that for a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act to be valid, the cheque must be drawn for the discharge of the drawer's liability. In this case, the cheque was not drawn for the petitioner's liability, and without proper documentation or evidence of liability transfer, no offense was established under Section 138. The judgment emphasized the necessity of clear evidence and documentation for liability transfer in cheque dishonor cases. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 14 Jun 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311482