https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35160 Counsel's personal engagement in another court was held not to be a sufficient ground for adjournment where the hearing date was known in advance and no representative was arranged. The Tribunal refused the adjournment request, and the stay application was dismissed for default because the appellant's counsel did not appear. Advance intimation to the Registry did not override the obligation to ensure representation at the hearing. The connected appeal was directed to be listed for further orders. en-us Wed, 13 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35160 Counsel's personal engagement in another court was held not to be a sufficient ground for adjournment where the hearing date was known in advance and no representative was arranged. The Tribunal refused the adjournment request, and the stay application was dismissed for default because the appellant's counsel did not appear. Advance intimation to the Registry did not override the obligation to ensure representation at the hearing. The connected appeal was directed to be listed for further orders. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 13 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35160