<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 2 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35155</link>
    <description>Commission income and commission received on assignment of export orders to another party in India were treated as part of profits eligible for deduction under section 80HHC, because the issue was already covered by the Supreme Court decisions in P. R. Prabhakar v. CIT and CIT v. Baby Marine Exports. Applying those binding authorities, the court found no further examination necessary and answered the questions against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2016 12:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73759" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 2 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35155</link>
      <description>Commission income and commission received on assignment of export orders to another party in India were treated as part of profits eligible for deduction under section 80HHC, because the issue was already covered by the Supreme Court decisions in P. R. Prabhakar v. CIT and CIT v. Baby Marine Exports. Applying those binding authorities, the court found no further examination necessary and answered the questions against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35155</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>