https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35134 The Vice-President upheld the lower appellate authority's decision in a case concerning a claim for refund of Extra Duty Deposit (EDD) rejected due to a missing triplicate copy of the Bill of Entry. The Commissioner (A) set aside the rejection, accepting the duplicate copy as sufficient evidence. The Vice-President referenced relevant regulations and found the duplicate submission satisfactory, leading to the approval of the refund claim. Cross objections were dismissed as they did not raise new issues. The ruling was affirmed, concluding the matter. en-us Fri, 06 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 08 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35134 The Vice-President upheld the lower appellate authority's decision in a case concerning a claim for refund of Extra Duty Deposit (EDD) rejected due to a missing triplicate copy of the Bill of Entry. The Commissioner (A) set aside the rejection, accepting the duplicate copy as sufficient evidence. The Vice-President referenced relevant regulations and found the duplicate submission satisfactory, leading to the approval of the refund claim. Cross objections were dismissed as they did not raise new issues. The ruling was affirmed, concluding the matter. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 06 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35134