<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 1337 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311474</link>
    <description>The HC reviewed a tax dispute involving excess input tax credit claims. The assessing authority directed the petitioner to remit Rs.2,74,570/- with interest and penalty. Despite the petitioner&#039;s rectification application, the HC dismissed the writ petition, advising the petitioner to file an appeal before the appellate authority, which would expeditiously consider the challenge to the assessment orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2025 10:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=737327" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 1337 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311474</link>
      <description>The HC reviewed a tax dispute involving excess input tax credit claims. The assessing authority directed the petitioner to remit Rs.2,74,570/- with interest and penalty. Despite the petitioner&#039;s rectification application, the HC dismissed the writ petition, advising the petitioner to file an appeal before the appellate authority, which would expeditiously consider the challenge to the assessment orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311474</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>