<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (2) TMI 1235 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311467</link>
    <description>When a maintainability objection based on assignment of debt is brought on record in a Section 7 insolvency proceeding and notice has already been issued, the adjudicating authority must decide that interlocutory application first before admitting the petition. The text relies on Section 5(4) of SARFAESI Act and Order 22 Rule 10 read with Rule 11 CPC to state that acquisition of the financial asset does not abate pending proceedings and may continue by or against the assignee. On those facts, the admission order passed without first disposing of the assignment-based application was held unsustainable, and the matter was remitted for fresh consideration after impleading the assignee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2023 08:44:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=737320" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (2) TMI 1235 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311467</link>
      <description>When a maintainability objection based on assignment of debt is brought on record in a Section 7 insolvency proceeding and notice has already been issued, the adjudicating authority must decide that interlocutory application first before admitting the petition. The text relies on Section 5(4) of SARFAESI Act and Order 22 Rule 10 read with Rule 11 CPC to state that acquisition of the financial asset does not abate pending proceedings and may continue by or against the assignee. On those facts, the admission order passed without first disposing of the assignment-based application was held unsustainable, and the matter was remitted for fresh consideration after impleading the assignee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311467</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>