https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447510 Anticipatory bail in an alleged GST evasion scheme was refused because the accusations disclosed a prima facie economic offence of substantial magnitude involving forged documents, bogus registration, dummy firms, fabricated bills, and wrongful input tax credit claims. The court treated the alleged deep-rooted conspiracy and loss to the public exchequer as material factors against exercising discretion under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. Economic offences were regarded as a distinct class requiring a cautious approach, and pre-arrest bail was declined on the prima facie assessment of the allegations. en-us Wed, 06 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Apr 2025 18:26:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447510 Anticipatory bail in an alleged GST evasion scheme was refused because the accusations disclosed a prima facie economic offence of substantial magnitude involving forged documents, bogus registration, dummy firms, fabricated bills, and wrongful input tax credit claims. The court treated the alleged deep-rooted conspiracy and loss to the public exchequer as material factors against exercising discretion under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. Economic offences were regarded as a distinct class requiring a cautious approach, and pre-arrest bail was declined on the prima facie assessment of the allegations. Case-Laws GST Wed, 06 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447510