<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (1) TMI 271 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35127</link>
    <description>Concessional customs duty under Notification No. 62/2007 depended on iron content being below 62%. Where the assessee&#039;s recognised testing agency and the destination-port certificate both showed iron content below that threshold, but the departmental laboratory report gave only a bare Fe percentage without disclosing the basis of calculation, the reliability of the departmental report became doubtful. The failure to consider the request for re-test and to deal with the assessee&#039;s objections with proper reasons was treated as unfair and contrary to natural justice, rendering denial of the notification benefit and the duty demand unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73731" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (1) TMI 271 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35127</link>
      <description>Concessional customs duty under Notification No. 62/2007 depended on iron content being below 62%. Where the assessee&#039;s recognised testing agency and the destination-port certificate both showed iron content below that threshold, but the departmental laboratory report gave only a bare Fe percentage without disclosing the basis of calculation, the reliability of the departmental report became doubtful. The failure to consider the request for re-test and to deal with the assessee&#039;s objections with proper reasons was treated as unfair and contrary to natural justice, rendering denial of the notification benefit and the duty demand unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35127</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>